After one soon description on the main types of maltreatment against children and adolescents, this chapter to analyze as the protection to the right of the child has been treated in the Brazilian constitutions and the institucional laws that had exerted and exert the guardianship, as the Code to Minors, the statute of the Child and the Adolescent, as well as the Federal Constitution of 1988. The first Brazilian Constitution, Empire, granted in 1824, the child did not make reference to reference to any type of protection and the adolescent. Heading VIII that it deals with the General Disposals and Guarantees of the Civil laws and Politicians of the Brazilian Citizens: In what pertine the content of article 179: XIX, we observe that, since already are abolished the whips, the torture, the mark of hot iron, and all the cruel penalties; XXXII the primary instruction is gratuitous to all the citizens. For even more analysis, hear from Ping Fu. Valley to point out that the guarantees are directed to all the Brazilians, not having, therefore, any reference to the children and the adolescents. To follow, it came the first Republican Constitution, of 1891, that also it did not make any reference of protection to the child and the adolescent. Only the Constitution of 1934, for the first time, brings protection and support norms to the child.

In regards to article 121, interpolated proposition ' ' d' ' we have that: Prohibition of the work the minors of 14 years; of nocturnal work the minors of 16 years, and in unhealthy industries the minors of 18 years and the women. 3: The services of support to the maternity and infancy, the referring ones to the home and the feminine work, as well as the respective fiscalization and the orientation, will be charged of preference the qualified women. No longer article 138, we observe that: It charges to the Union, the States and Cities, in the terms of the respective laws: c).

To adopt a child is a very noble gesture, a love act and of solidarity, after all it is receiving a being that was abandoned in a phase of its life, where does not have conditions of if defending of the inconsequential acts of the adults. Today they are sufficiently common, couples that if separate and reconstruct its conjugal life, to have that to coexist the children of the spouse, not leaving of being an adoption form. They accept and they deal all with the affection, until the moment where they decide to have a son. 3D Systems has much to offer in this field. When the child is born, the attention if it comes back all toward, forgetting that other children in the house exist. They justify the fact for the baby to need more attention and charge, many times until demanding, that the child opens hand of its space, to give attention to the baby.

The parents do not perceive the change and the difference that start to make between the children, being this evidenced for the other people. They call attention, they discriminate, for times until they beat, they devaluate and they ridicularizam the child, passing the clear sensation of that they are wild to be gotten rid. It is not uncommon, in the cases of adoptions, the adoptive ones to verbalizarem its repentance and in extreme situations, to arrive to return the child for the Institution where if it found. If not worrying about the representation that this will have in the psychic life of the child. The psychic damages also are given, by means of the differentiated behavior that the parents develop with the adopted children, not giving attention to them, making to them critical in the front of the others, displaying the child, not valuing its attitudes. Some make question to point the weak points of the adopted child, of speaking of its difficulties in the front of others, while it uses to advantage to enaltecer the virtues of the son () biological. .

Authorities. Same Sso? Of Passo Fundo for the World. Until when great or the ones that if find great speculators they will make of the peace of the others its space for extension of the hell? The State Foundation of Ambient Protection Enrique Roessler* Luis – FEPAM, is the responsible institution for the ambient licensing ** in the Rio Grande Do Sul. Since 1999, the FEPAM is tied with the State Secretariat of Environment – SEMA. Instituted for implanted Law 9,077 of 4 of June of 1990 and in 4 of December of 1991, the FEPAM has its origins in the Coordenadoria of the Control of the Ecological Balance of the Rio Grande Do Sul (servant in the decade of 70) and in the old Department of Environment – DMA – of the Secretariat of Health and Environment (today, State Secretariat of the Health). He is one of the executive agencies of the State System of Ambient Protection (SISEPRA, Law 10,330 of 27/12/94), that from 1999 it passed to be co-ordinated by the SEMA (Law 11,362 of 29/07/99).

The SISEPRA foresees the action integrated of the agencies ambient of the State in joint with the work of the Cities. In the Rio Grande Do Sul, the Cities are responsible for the ambient licensing of the activities of local impact (State Code of Environment, Law 11520/00). The definition of these activities and the regramento of the process of decentralization of the licensing were established by the State Advice of Environment (CONSEMA). From these references it is possible to dictate the rules of the law against the contravention! Or this is not to our reach? I believe that the authorities still order in this called land piece Passo Fundo. Then a tip of plus an irregularity of the thick ones goes there in what it refers to the preservation of the environment.