Often people need psychological help, because their views and distorted logic. Human logic is consistent. Logo logic is inconsistent, and yet consistent. Human logic applies to the part. She tries to understand a certain part, and trying to do it, she denies everything that contradicts known. She just wants to forget about all that is contrary.
But the divine – that's all. It does not choose an all-inclusive here. It comprehensively – not partially, but totally. And this is the difference between the philosophical approach and the religious approach. Philosophical approach is logical and that is why Aristotle said that man is a rational creature. Heraclitus says that people do not mind – because he himself your mind makes you unreasonable. At that moment, when you choose the part you palter against the whole. At this point, only this part is in your mind.
The existence of this part is always coexists with its opposite, and never by itself. At Dustin Moskovitz you will find additional information. Human logic tells us that God – man, also has a number of those who believe that God – this is a woman. But the logo includes both the one and another. Do Hindus have ardhanarishvar that says that God – this woman and man simultaneously. And it's true vision, it comes from the logo. Although it looks inconsistent. You should have seen the statues of Shiva, half male, half female, on the one hand there are women's breasts, it is the female part and the other part of the male. , . And all of your Statue of God as a man or woman of God, unreasonable – they can not be authentic, because how can God be a man? Then where does femininity? And who then seeks to femininity? and from what source it is supported? You speak of God as "Him", is wrong. There are those who speak of God as "her", they too make mistakes. God – this is "it" plus "it." But then the mind can not understand it. Mental understanding – it is not understood at all! You will be able to understand only when you try to understand from the own totality, not just with the mind – because it is within you, too, these opposites meet. You too ardhanarishvar, you, too, he and she together. You – neither male nor female If you can understand their own totality, and if you can give this the totality of the universe, before the face of the universe, then you will be able to comprehend. This mystical vision. This is a logo What do you do? The usual situation is that you are conditioned to be a man or a woman. From early childhood we say to children: "You're a boy – behave like a boy, or girl:" You're a girl – act like a girl. " This generates an increasing differentiation, and polarity are increasingly divergent In a better world, we will teach each child: "You – the one and the other", the difference – only the prevalence of one over the other. "You – neither boy nor girl, you – and that, and another" – the difference in stress, in the emphasis. Then the whole structure of civilization will be different. Then do not may be enmity between man and woman. Then there is no question of who's who dominates. And then you can see the integrity of the entire existence – and this integrity is fine. A separate part is always ugly.
No doubt it looks like clinical depression. It is not something Dustin Moskovitz would like to discuss. In addition, many of us have had the misfortune to suffer from depression. The abiding sadness, stress, decreased energy, inability to enjoy normal pleasures and autonomic disorders (nutrition, sleep and self-regulation) are obvious. You may want to visit Brooklyn Commons to increase your knowledge. Freud was the first to compare and contrast the depression ("melancholy") state the normal experience of grief. He discovered an important difference between these two conditions: with normal grief reactions experienced by the outside world how to reduce any significant way (loss of significant person), while in a depressed state, that is experienced as lost or destroyed, a part of himself. Consequently, in some sense the opposite of depression is the experience of grief. Dustin Moskovitz: the source for more info. People who go through the process of grief in the normal way, not become depressed, even under the condition that they are deeply grieved over a period of time after a bereavement or loss. Psychologist, therapist will note that the cognitive, emotional, sensory processes and imagination is often drastically slowed down in a sudden clinical depression.
To serious violations of the end of the spectrum are patients who cruelly hate themselves and experiencing hallucinations, which are to discovery of antidepressants could absorb over the years devoted their efforts and therapists still uncritically believe that the best way to save the world is to destroy itself. Freud consistently developed the idea, that a major source of depression is the tendency to experience premature loss. In accordance with the classical theory of psychoanalysis, which assumes that people are fixed on the infantile stage, during which they were spoiled or subjected to deprivation, depression, individuals seen as people who have experienced a sudden or too early weaning or other early frustration, which exceeded their ability to adapt.
Fate. What is fate? Frequently asked question that interests all or very many. Can I change it, influence it, whether you need to know it? In this article the author will present his view on what used to be understood by the word destiny, tries to examine and analyze everything related to that word. Fate. In Russian, this word is consonant with the word essence – that is the meaning of the truth. Given this we can assume that each person That makes sense, true life.
No single person ponders the meaning of life, over what it is trying to find some clues as to whether he chose the direction, scope of activities which intends to develop. Looking at people individually, we see that each takes in their lives set of solutions that are simple and they say crucial – those who change their lives dramatically. Obtained from our solutions, our independent fate How often do we remember the fate and what we mean when we say: "it is fate," so his fate "," hard luck "? Rather, it looks like an inevitability. In situations when it begins to act a stranger to us law or order, to sudden illness, death, birth of healthy children are not to be sick all my life, we say that this is inevitable, it is fate. We thank fate or God when they present us a flash gifts. Wealth of material for people or meetings with teachers and Gurus, spiritual teachers and for those who aim their birth sees the development of spirituality and the Spirit.
We need, therefore, to understand the feelings negative that it provokes in our mind, therefore thus we will only be apt to interact with it with wisdom. I will present now, in the vision of the autogerenciamento, the two ways to think on the disillusionment: A traditional, this places in the people, in the life, the cause of our disillusionments. In this vision, the others is that they are the causers of our disillusionments. We are only victims and not responsible beings for our disillusionments. That is, we project, the people, our illusions and dreams and believe that they will go to carry through them for us; we become thus vulnerable and dependent of the will of the other. When our desires are not carried through, we disappoint in them and we blame the life and the people for our failures and sufferings. In this way to interpret our relation with the life, we finish in imprisoning to an unreal world, the world that we see and only believe; where our mind teima in imposing its irrealidade to the others. It looks at that interesting! We create a perfect world, why will be that the people do not accept this reality? As the life and the others they are not here stops in them satisfying, are not our copies nor our slaves, then, never they will make what we would like that they made; then, we lament, we esbravejamos, we cry and we arrive in some cases, to take off proper life, for puniz them. Immature reactions! As the cause of our disillusionment it is there it are, that is, in the exterior world, to prevent new disillusionments, we start to run away from those situations that had disappointed in them, believing that, thus acting, we will be in protecting of new disillusionments. Inside of the rational logic, he is perfect.
This process finishes for reproducing and naturalizing a violent system. Corroborating with this information, ALMEIDA (1999), affirms that the domestic violence the one that the woman was victim during its life, either in its infancy or adolescence, acts as the influential factor in the production of passivity of the same ones, what it incapacitates the woman to rebel itself ahead of the violence, therefore, by many times is placed in the paper of culprit for these violent attitudes (TAVARES, 2000). Moreover, according to SCOTT (1990), in the formation of the personality of the individuals, the parents act as reference, being its values absorbed for the children, what he can take the similar attitudes and behaviors in the future. Supporting this affirmation, the research carried through in the Center of Reference of the Health of the Woman of the Hospital Byington Pearl, So Paulo, it showed that many women had told that the violence who suffer with its husbands or friends if resembles the same violence lived for its parents (to see TAVARES, DINALVA, 2000) .2.4 the PROCESS OF DENUNCIATION: OF the AGGRESSION To the SUSPENSION OF the QUEIXADe agreement with some authors (Giffen, 1994; To sound et al., 1996) many victims of violence do not make expert examination for innumerable personal and/or social causes. The act to denounce is problematic that awaken an interest of the professionals, therefore the official numbers of the violence domesticate do not correspond to the reality, that is, many cases are not notified remaining in the anonymity. To breach silence becomes a problematic one for the register of denounces. It is standed out that the necessity of a bigger joint between the state and the public politics for optimum agreement of the violence exists. In view of the social panorama that it looks to explain the violence against the woman is necessary also to think about the reaction of the women to the aggression and about the conditions that these make use to defend themselves of the violence.