Third Impact


The decision of the Council of Ministers of Belarus on April 28, 2010 639 reads: "1.101. charges for public utility services to the citizens living in manor houses Superior *, will be charged according to the established laws of the Republic Belarus tariffs to ensure full recovery of economically justified costs for these services, on the basis of lists of such buildings, approved the city and district executive committees, the administrations of city districts; essence of this legislation – in obtaining money from some and sending the money to others. This, in theory, but who in this case would be a "donor"? From studying the document, it appears that it will citizens who have an area of the cottage or city apartment over 200 square meters. For heat, water, gas and electricity, they will pay more. As of 8 July this year, tariffs that provide a full refund costs are: the cold water supply – 860 byr / cu. m, for sanitation – 684,3 byr / cu. m, for heating and hot water – 86.894 byr / Gcal, maintenance – 622,5 byr / sq.

m. That is, the average payment for such housing should be increased by 70%. In areas individual construction of communication, usually placed by the developers. Why is this gas for their personal trumpet became more expensive? We are told: – The population pays the utility bills by 38%, the rest to pay for them state It's not. The state has no value for money, other than those it has collected from its citizens. State – is not an abstract uncle, who came with their money to us and giving them some.

People are underpaid for work, the money is collected in one fund, in return they pay for heat slightly less cost. And what happens? Who has more of those square feet – more receiving these subsidies. Imagine a frosty winter, and two apartment. In one, a two-bedroom "hruschevke" lives of five people. In another, two hundred squares, no one lives. She bought as investment. However, hot water is rushing here and there in the batteries. As a result, a wealthy citizen receives from the state more than the poor. This is unfair. In this sense, the decision is correct. But if the house more than 200 sq ft home to several families or a large family of 3 generations, which are specifically invested funds build a house instead of three apartments. However -. Why are energy costs so high that the citizens can not pay for it in full? Why Energy contain a football team and pay from our pocket travel for training to foreign countries? More should be added that the ruling, although information has caused a wave is a transition to a situation where energy for all would cost as much as is her delivery. Now The situation is complicated, moreover, consciously, many people are fed with the complexity of the process. Even the creation of an autonomous heating systems will not protect. You can get his heat pump or water. Even electricity. In this case we can impose taxes on sunlight, air, earth minerals and so on.